Monitoring system and method with signal tampering detection

ABSTRACT

A system and method for detecting potential tampering with a data stream from a monitoring device is provided. The method includes storing a list of cellular receivers and at least one corresponding geographic characteristic; receiving, from a remote monitoring device through a cellular network, a location of the monitoring device and the identity of a particular cellular receiver that relayed the location; identifying, from the received location and the stored at least one corresponding geographic characteristic, an expected cellular receiver from the list of cellular receivers; comparing the particular cellular receiver with the expect cellular receiver; and issuing an alert based on at least a negative result of the comparing.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent applicationSer. No. 14/946,954 entitled MONITORING SYSTEM AND METHOD WITH SIGNALTAMPERING DETECTION filed on Nov. 20, 2015, the contents of which areexpressly incorporated herein by reference.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The various embodiments described herein relate generally to preventingsignal tampering with monitoring devices. More particularly, variousembodiments herein relate to detecting attempts to access cellulartransmission of monitoring devices.

BACKGROUND

The monitoring of movements of monitored individuals involves a varietyof sectors, including parolees and home confinement. The technology hasits roots in the home arrest systems of the 1980's, in which a userwearable component—typically a “beacon” anklet that was locked to themonitored person—would communicate wirelessly with a stationary baseunit. The range was limited to a few feet of the radio frequencytransmitter and receiver. The base unit included a telephone connectionfor communicating with the authorities. If the monitored person left theshort range allowed by the equipment, the tag and the base unit wouldlose contact and the base unit would respond by sending an alert to theauthorities.

A later generation of the technology incorporated GPS and cellulartelephone technology in a locked anklet. The device would activelyrecord the location of the monitored person over time and transmit thedata to a central monitoring location (e.g., police or parole monitoringservices). The central location could store and analyze the data forprohibited movements (e.g., a sex offender near a school) or crossreference the movement data with crime data to see if the monitoredperson was near the crime at the time of the crime. U.S. Pat. Nos.5,867,103, 6,160,481, 6,218,945, 6,512,456 and 6,703,936, incorporatedherein by reference in their entireties, are each exemplary of such asystem. The technology is also used to monitor other personal sectors(e.g., patients, children) and objects (e.g., cars, cargo).

The modern monitoring device includes a GPS receiver that determineslocation, a memory that stores location data over time to define amovement history, and a cellular modem that communicates the movementhistory to a central location through the cell network. A commonimplementation is in the criminal justice system as an alternative toincarceration, and monitored persons (typically parolees) have tamperresistant devices attached to their leg or wrist.

Various attempts have been made to circumvent the monitoring devices viaan external modification to prevent receipt of GPS signals and/ortransmission of the movement data. Examples of such attempts includewrapping the monitoring device in foil or generating a local jammingsignal.

An area in which monitoring devices have historically been immune tointerference is hacking into the data transmission of the device itself.The tracking devices include various tamper detection methodologies,such that any attempt to breach the shell of the monitoring device andaccess the inner electronics would be detected (either electronically orby the visible physical damage to the casing). The cellular networksthat the devices communicate with have historically been generallyinaccessible to the public. Some monitoring devices also communicatelocally (wifi range) with trusted dedicated receivers that also includevarious tamper detection methodologies, such that any attempt to breachthe shell of the trusted dedicated receivers and access the innerelectronics would be detected (either electronically or by the visiblephysical damage to the casing). Absent access to the internalelectronics or cell network, the data stream from the monitoring devicesis secure.

In recent years, various technologies have emerged that allow a greaterdegree of local access to cellular communications. For example, sometelecommunication companies now provide cellular base stations thatmimic a small cell tower and provide local cellular service through ahigh speed Internet connection; the Samsung SCS-26UC4 Verizon NetworkExtender Base Station is an example of such a device. Similar (in somecases illegal) technologies also allow users to construct their ownlocal cellular base station through their laptop or PC. These deviceshave an open air range of several dozen yards, less so when in anenclosed building.

Monitoring devices tend to use standardized cellular modem technologythat switch between cell towers as appropriate. Such devices underappropriate conditions could detach from the local cell tower and attachto a local legal/illegal short range cellular base station. Data flowfrom the monitoring devices would thus be passing through this localconnection.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Various embodiments in accordance with the present disclosure will bedescribed with reference to the drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 illustrates an embodiment of a monitoring device attached to anankle of a user.

FIG. 2 illustrates an embodiment of the internal components of themonitoring device of FIG. 1.

FIG. 3 illustrates an operating environment of the monitoring device ofFIG. 1.

FIG. 4 illustrates movement of monitored individuals over time relativeto the operating boundary of a cell tower.

FIG. 5 illustrates movement of monitored individuals over time near theoperating boundary of the cell tower of FIG. 4.

FIG. 6 illustrates movement of a monitored device through a network ofcell towers.

FIG. 7 illustrates connection of a monitoring device relative toadjacent cell towers.

FIG. 8 illustrates a cellular base station operating within the boundaryof the cell tower of FIG. 4.

FIG. 9 illustrates the embodiment of FIG. 4 with directional antennas.

FIGS. 10 and 11 are flowcharts of an embodiment of the invention.

FIG. 12 illustrates a logical arrangement of a set of general componentsof an example computing device that can be utilized in accordance withvarious embodiments.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In the following description, various embodiments will be illustrated byway of example and not by way of limitation in the figures of theaccompanying drawings. References to various embodiments in thisdisclosure are not necessarily to the same embodiment, and suchreferences mean at least one. While specific implementations and otherdetails are discussed, it is to be understood that this is done forillustrative purposes only. A person skilled in the relevant art willrecognize that other components and configurations may be used withoutdeparting from the scope and spirit of the claimed subject matter.

Several definitions that apply throughout this disclosure will now bepresented. The term “substantially” is defined to be essentiallyconforming to the particular dimension, shape, or other feature that theterm modifies, such that the component need not be exact. For example,“substantially cylindrical” means that the object resembles a cylinder,but can have one or more deviations from a true cylinder. The term“comprising” when utilized, means “including, but not necessarilylimited to”; it specifically indicates open-ended inclusion ormembership in the so-described combination, group, series and the like.The terms “cell receiver” or “cellular receiver” refer to a device suchas a cell tower or cellular base station that communicates with thecellular modem of a monitoring device. The term “monitored population”or “population” refers to a group of persons and/or objects that aresubject to monitoring.

FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a monitoring device 12 according to anembodiment of the invention. A monitoring device 12 can determine itslocation, such as through the Global Positioning Satellite, cell towers,LORAN, or other known methodologies; for sake of brevity discussionherein is confined to GPS, although the invention is not so limited.Device 12 is shown as a one-piece unit, although multiple pieces asknown in the art could also be used.

A band 22 secures monitoring device to a limb of the user, typically theankle, via a locking mechanism that preferably can only be opened by anauthorized person. An ankle is shown in FIG. 1, although the inventionis not limited thereto. Monitoring device 12 and band 22 preferably havetamper detection capabilities as is known in the art and not discussedfurther herein. The invention is not limited to any particular securingand/or tamper detection methodology.

An authorized person would be one or more people having some type ofsupervisory responsibility and/or decision making relative to themonitored person. By way of non-limiting example, a parole officer wouldbe the authorized person relative to a parolee. Other non-limitingexamples include parent/child, patient/medical supervisor, etc. Securityand/or police could be considered an authorized person relative to apopulation of monitored persons to the extent the emergency levelintervention is necessary. For sake of brevity, discussion herein isconfined to parolee/parole officer relationship, although the inventionis not so limited. The invention also applies to objects that can bemonitored, such as cars or cargo.

Referring now to FIG. 2, a non-limiting example of monitoring device 12includes a dedicated circuit for determining its location, such as a GPSreceiver chip 13. A cellular modem 14 preferably provided with a SIMcard allows the monitoring device 12 to communicate through the cellularnetwork with a central monitoring station 40. A short range wirelessmodem 16 (e.g., 915 MHz or 802.11 compatible Wi-Fi or Bluetooth) allowsthe monitoring device 12 to communicate locally with other deviceswithin the short range as is known in the art for such devices. Modems14 and 16 may be the same modem operable to communicate on differentfrequencies. A substance detector 18 may be provided to monitor thepresence of prohibited substances in the monitored individual, such asthrough a sensor in contact with the skin; the configuration ofsubstance detectors within a portable monitored device are known bythose of skill in the art and not further discussed herein. Tamperdetection mechanism 19 monitors for tamper detection as is known in theart. Batteries, a power port, memory, I/O interface, wired communicationaccess and other supporting computer hardware and software as is knownin the art are also preferably provided and not discussed furtherherein. Monitoring device 12 may be integrated into a single unit ormultiple units as is known in the art. The invention is not limited tothe details of the architecture of monitoring device 12.

Referring now to FIG. 3, monitoring device 12 is shown in an operatingenvironment. Multiple satellites 30 provide the GPS timestamps that GPSreceiver 13 in monitoring device 12 converts into location information.The location information represents the location of the monitoringdevice 12, and by extension the location information for the monitoredindividual, at a particular time. Monitoring device 12 can transmit thatinformation as location data in near real time, and/or can store thelocation information as location data in memory and batch transfercollected location data as dictated by the need of the system (e.g., ona fixed and/or random schedule, or in response to an event or specificinstruction to do so). If substance detection capability is present,then information relating to screening(s) may be similarly stored,transmitted in near real time or batch transmitted collectively, eitherwith or separately from the location data.

Monitoring device 12 preferably has at least two options for remotecommunications, including data transfer. The first is through the shortrange modem 16 with a trusted home monitoring device 40 when within therange (e.g., <300 feet, more particularly about 50-100 feet) of theshort range modem 16. The second is through the cell/long range modem 14(potentially miles) to a cell tower 32 when the monitoring device is outof range of the home monitoring device 40. Preferably both cell tower 32and home monitoring device 50 connect to central monitoring location 35and/or an authorized person 37, whether directly or through interveningequipment as known in the art.

Central monitoring location 35 is “central” in the sense that it servesone or more monitoring devices 12. It may be a single location, multiplelocations operating independently, or a distributed arrangement. At amost basic level the central monitoring location 35 is no more than acomputer (e.g., a server) having a memory, processor, modem,input/output, and other supporting computer hardware and software as isknown in the art, although in practice they may be large facilities withdistributed computers and human handlers. The invention is not limitedto the architecture or layout of the central monitoring location 35.

The monitoring device 12 obtains geographic location information andexchanges the location data with the central monitoring location 35and/or the authorized person 37. The monitoring device 12 generallytransmits location data updates to the central monitoring location 35,either directly or through home monitoring device 40 (inclusive ofintervening equipment as necessary, such as the cell network).

The data received by central monitoring location 35 from the monitoringdevices 12 includes a combination of information related to eachmonitoring device 12 and information about the cell tower 32 thatrelayed information from each monitoring device. Types of informationfrom devices 12 are well known in the art, but generally includes atleast some type of identification of the particular device 12 (e.g., adevice identification number) and location data. Information about celltower 32 includes at least some type of identification of the particulartower (e.g., the cell tower ID), but may also include MCC Mobile CountryCode, MNC Mobile Network Code, LAC Location Are Code, CID CellIdentification. Signal strength and timing advance may also be includedto provide information further defining the location of a monitoringdevice 12 within the coverage area itself.

The information about cell tower 32 can be determined by monitoringdevice 12 via its connection with cell tower 32 (e.g., the monitoringdevice 12 could through handshaking with the cell tower 32 know theidentity of the cell tower 32 and add that information to itscommunications with central location 35). In the alternative, theinformation about cell tower 32 could be incorporated by cell tower 32directly as it forwards data from the monitoring device 12 to centralmonitoring location 35. Combinations of the two are also possible. Theinvention is not limited to the manner in which information about celltower 32 is obtained and paired with the location data sent by theportable monitoring device 12.

Central monitoring location 35 receives the information and uses thelocation data along with cell tower information to determine geographiccharacteristic of the particular cell tower 32. By way of non-limitingexample, FIG. 4 shows movement data for three people 404, 406 and 408relative to an omnidirectional cell tower 432 with identification code432 having an operating range defined by a boundary 402 (which may inpart be dictated by adjacent cell towers, not shown). Each step A-Drepresents the location at a point in time, e.g., 9:00 AM, 9:02 AM, 9:04AM, etc. Person 402 moves along a path (indicated by triangles) thatstays entirely within the range of the cell tower 432 during the period.Person 406 moves along a path (represented by circles) that is initiallyoutside the range of cell tower 432 and then moves into range. Person408 is a stationary person (e.g., asleep) with no movement during theperiod and thus a path represented by a single square. Information foreach movement point within boundary 402 (404A-D, 406B-D and 408A-D) asreceived by central monitoring location 35 represents a correlationbetween cell tower 432 and a geographic location within boundary 402. Incontrast, point 406A is outside the boundary 402, and thus would beassociated with a different cell tower.

Location data received for monitoring devices 12 received from celltower 432 (404A-D, 406B-D, and 408A-D, but not 406A) can be analyzed todefine geographic characteristics of cell tower 432. By way ofnon-limiting example, the location data can be combined to define anartificial position marker 420 that represents a point of averagemovement with boundary 402. Under ideal conditions, uniform movement ofa monitored population within boundary 402 would result in an “average”position for artificial position marker 420 that would coincide with theexact physical location of cell tower 432. As a practical matteractivity is often not that uniform; for example, if cell tower 432 isadjacent to a small town where the monitored group spends most of theirtime, then position marker 420 would tend to be within the town and awayfrom the cell tower 432.

In combination with an allowable distance from the artificial positionmarker 420, central monitoring location 35 would be able to define anarea relative to artificial position marker 420. This effectivelyestablishes tower 432 as the expected cell tower for that area.

Another non-limiting example of use of the location data received frommonitored devices 12 within the boundary of cell tower 432 is to definean approximate boundary of the coverage of cell tower 432. Specifically,the central monitoring location 35 can recognize that any location datawith the cell tower ID (or other cell tower identifying information) ofcell tower 432 is within the range of cell tower 432. Referring now toFIG. 5, over time the continued accumulation of locations 502(represented by circles, triangles and squares) reported by monitoringdevices 12 would provide an approximation of the outer boundary 402. Tothe extent that the monitored population does not uniformly travel overthe entire area covered by cell tower 432, then the location data wouldat the very least establish an outer border of expected movement of themonitored population relative to cell tower 432. This effectivelyestablishes tower 432 as the expected cell tower for the area.

The embodiments discussed above have primarily been addressed in thecontext of a single cell tower 432. While there are a limited number ofcircumstances in which a single tower is in use, typically a network ofadjacent towers 432, such as shown in FIG. 6, collectively cover amonitored population. The methodology herein forms geographiccharacteristics of the individual cell towers within the network as themonitored population (represented generically by 602) moves within thenetwork. Note the methodology would typically only address those towerswithin the network that provide some service to the monitoredpopulation, and as such it may be expected that not every cell towerwill have corresponding geographic characteristics available at centralmonitoring location 35. Central monitoring location 35 stores the notedgeographic characteristics relative to cell towers 432 from which itreceives location data.

As central monitoring location subsequently receives new uploadedlocation data from monitored devices 12, central monitoring location 35monitors the incoming information and notes any of a potential number ofirregularities in the expected data. A non-limiting example of anyirregularity is that the received cell tower ID is not consistent withthat expected from the location data. Central monitoring location 35 cancompare the location at the approximate time of the upload with thecollected geographic characteristics to identify the corresponding“expected” cell tower that would/should have transmitted thecorresponding location data. Receiving GPS data that had a differentcell tower ID than cell tower 432 would be an irregularity, and isindicative (but not necessarily conclusive) that the signal has beenintercepted by a local base station.

By way of non-limiting example, and referring to FIG. 7, two adjacentcell towers 702 and 704 are shown. A monitored device 712 uploads itslocation data to central monitoring location 35 through cell tower 702.Central monitoring location 35 determines from the received locationdata the location of the monitoring device 712 at the time of upload.Based on that location, central monitoring location 35 determines thatfrom the prior stored geographic characteristics that a monitored deviceat that location should be uploading through cell tower 702. Centralmonitoring location then compares whether this is in fact the case,i.e., whether cell tower 702 actually relayed the location data asexpected. When there is a match (as is the case in FIG. 7), the systemis operating as intended.

Referring now to FIG. 8, a counter example is shown in which locationdata is received from an unexpected cell receiver. The example isillustrated in the environment of FIG. 4, in which a person installs alocal cellular base station 802 (which may be legal or illegal)connected to their local high speed internet, and which has an operatingrange defined by boundary 804 (either its open air range, or as limitedby intervening structures). A monitoring device 812 at time A uploadsits location; since device 812 is outside of the range of local basestation 802, the upload is through cell tower 432 and central monitoringstation will receive the cell tower ID for cell tower 432. Based on thelocation of device 812 at time A cell tower 432 is the expected celltower. This represents routine operating conditions and would notindicate anything amiss, as was the case in FIG. 7.

At time B, monitored device 812 has moved into range of cellular basestation 802, and cell modem 14 per its standard protocol will detachfrom cell tower 432 and attach to the cellular base station 802.Monitoring device 812 will thus upload to central location 35 bearingthe cell ID of the cellular base station 802, and not that of cell tower432. Central monitoring location 35 for its part determines thatlocation B should have uploaded from cell tower 432 as the expectedcellular receiver, and then determines that upload was relayed bysomething unexpected, in this case cellular base station 802.

Central location 35 can flag this discrepancy and report the same to theauthorities. The authorities can go directly to the area that the GPSdata indicated that monitoring device 812 was proximate to base station802 and physically investigate potential foul play. On the other hand,if upon investigation the base station 802 is considered legitimate(e.g., a lawfully issued local base station that happens to be operatingat the location), the central monitoring location 35 can update itsdatabase to reflect the same, essentially adding base station 802 to thelist/map of possible cell receiving sources.

As an addition and/or alternative, there is a known preference in theart to minimize the reliance on authorities to avoid desensitizing themto alerts; this could particularly be the case given the presence oflegal base stations sold by telecom vendors and for which havenon-nefarious purpose. It may therefore be desirable to conductalternative/complementary analysis of the data to provide a superiorestimation of the risk provided by the data.

One such test would be to distinguish between legitimate andillegitimate cell sources. A legal and legitimate cellular base stationfrom a provider such as Verizon or AT&T may pose a lower concern than anunregistered cellular base station. Central location 35 can thus monitorthe incoming data from base station 812 for indicia of a particulartrusted cellular carrier. The presence of that indicia would indicate alegitimate cell receiver, while the absence of that indicia wouldindicate an illegitimate cell receiver.

Another such test would be the number of monitored devices 12 sendingdata through cellular base station 802. If central location 35identifies several devices using base station 802, this may indicatethat base station 802 is legitimately provided to supplement cellcoverage in large areas, such as a workplace or mall; it could also be abackup cell tower taking over for a failed main cell tower. If centrallocation 35 identifies a small number of devices 12, or a single device12, which may use base station 802 continuously, this may indicate thatbase station 802 is an illegitimate cell source.

Another such test is whether base station 802 has moved. Specifically,central monitoring location can determine geographic characteristicsabout base station 802 in the same manner as cell tower 432; theoperating range is smaller, but the principles remain the same. If basestation 802 was moved to a different location, then the GPS data wouldbe inconsistent with the expected location of base station 802.

Another such test is to determine whether the received cell towerinformation corresponds to a nearby cell tower. For example, in FIG. 7monitoring device 712 is in range of cell tower 702 but could beattached to cell tower 704. There are a variety of reasons this couldoccur. For example, cell towers can malfunction, and if cell tower 432malfunctions then monitoring device 12 could attach to a differentnearby cell tower. In another example, various location determinationmethodologies are known to have a range of error, and even though thelocation indicates that the monitored person is in a location consistentwith one cell tower they are in fact at a location consistent withanother cell tower. The boundaries of cell towers themselves are notnecessarily static, and can shift based upon environmental and powerconditions. Connecting to an adjacent cell tower could be a commonoccurrence when a monitoring device is moving near or crossing a borderof two cell towers, such as monitoring device 716 in FIG. 7. Theinvention is not limited to the manner that a monitoring device 12 mayindicate a relationship with a nearby cell tower.

Another test is to determine whether the data indicates a concern for anon-cell tower issue. For example, the data from monitoring device 12may indicate that the monitored person may have consumed alcohol. Thecombination of alcohol consumption in conjunction with a cell towerirregularity could prompt a higher level of priority and correspondingreaction. The types of non-cell tower issues in the art are well knownand not discussed further herein.

Other possible tests may relate to factors that are not specific to thetracking environment, but rather more specific to the cell environment.Central monitoring location 35 could store such cell tower informationand conduct comparisons in the same manner as the tracking environmentabove.

By way of non-limiting example, the LAC of the current base station maydiffer from the LAC of many neighboring cells. Either alone or incombination with MCC and MNC and prior location data, an irregularity isdetected. In essence the central monitoring location 35 is receivingcell information that does not correlate to what was previouslycollected by monitoring devices near the reported location.

By way of another non-limiting example, a variance in the channelnumbers or frequency for same LAC/CID may indicate an irregularity. Inthis case the same LAC/CID is detected but on an unexpected channel orfrequency.

By way of another non-limiting example, cell information may includeinformation for neighboring cells, and the absence of that informationmay indicate an irregularity. A base station 802 may try to prevent amonitoring device from transitioning back to a regular cell tower. Forthat reason a base station 802 may announce no neighboring cells suchthat the monitoring device will use base station 802 until its signallevel is too low to maintain the attachment.

By way of another non-limiting example, signal strength and/or timingadvance irregularities could be detected. These qualities could bemapped against location and maintained in a database. Unexpected changesin those parameters could indicate an irregularity, e.g., atraditionally weaker signal for a particular cell source at a locationsuddenly has an extremely strong signal.

Monitoring systems may be set with different levels of reaction tocertain circumstances. By way of non-limiting example in the parolespace, reactions may be reporting, which may include, one-per dayreporting, reporting immediately to probation, and/or reportingimmediately to police. For example, the amount of alcohol consumed andthe location of the monitored person at the location are factors; asmall amount of alcohol at home may be a non-event, but a large amountof alcohol near a school can be a priority matter. An irregularity inthe cell tower data as discussed herein could be a modifier in the levelof action. For example, detection of consumption of a small amount ofalcohol at home may be a no-reporting event, but if in combination witha cell tower irregularity may prompt a higher level of concern (e.g.,report immediately). In the alternative, central monitoring location 35could change the status of the monitoring device 12, such as byincreasing the data transfer rate or issuing a warning to the monitoredperson. In other circumstances reactions may include logging or therecordings of data.

In some embodiments, every instance of location data includescorresponding cell tower information. In other embodiments, only some ofthe location data includes the corresponding cell tower information. Theembodiments are flexible to utilize all location data that has cellinformation, or only some of that information. By way of non-limitingexample, as noted above monitoring devices 12 may transmit theirlocation data in near real time or batch transfer location data afterperiods of accumulation, for which interest might only be in thelocation of the monitoring device 12 at or near the time of transfer(e.g., last minute before transfer in 1 ten minute transfer cycle); itmay therefore not be necessary to analyze all location data, but ratheronly the most/more recent location data.

Embodiments herein discuss the bulk of the methodology being performedby the central monitoring location 35. However, the invention is not solimited, and some or all of the operations may also be performed atmonitoring device 12.

The above embodiments have been in the context of an omnidirectionalcell tower 432. However, the invention is not so limited, anddirectional cells towers can be used. As is known in the art,directional cell towers with multiple directional antennas createsectors within a particular cell. Embodiments herein can be applied togeographic characteristics of the cell tower collectively (e.g.,collective considerations of all sectors assigned to a tower), or to thegeographic characteristics of the individual sectors. In the latter casethe particular directional antenna for each sector could be consideredits own cell receiver.

By way of non-limiting example, a group of cell sectors are expectedwithin the range of the cell tower. An anomaly would be to receive datafrom a cell receiver other than the expected group of sectors.

A directional example is shown with respect to FIG. 9, in which therange of cell tower 432 of FIG. 4 is split into three sectors 902, 904and 906 by three directional antennas. As in the prior embodiments, therange of the entire cell tower could be used for the geographiccharacteristics. In the alternative, sector based geographiccharacteristics could be used, such as maps or individual artificialmarkers 912, 914 and 916 for each sector.

In implementation, organizations often operate independently and/or withsome degree of cooperation. For example, a similar system could beoperated by a California correction authority and a New York correctionauthority. Each such system may be operated independently. In thealternative, they could share information about the cell towers withintheir areas to cover the event of travel between the two by members ofthe monitored population.

Referring now to FIG. 10, various steps in an embodiment of themethodology are shown for developing the geographic characteristics ofthe cell receivers. At 1002, a plurality of monitoring devices isprovided to a monitored population. Each of the monitoring devices cantransmit via cellular modem at least location data representing itsapproximate location. It is to be understood that this step may be astatic one time deployment, but more likely is an ongoing effort thatadds and subtracts monitoring devices as the monitored populationchanges (e.g., new parolees enter while some parolees are released).

At 1004, over a period of time each of monitoring devices transmits atleast location data representing its location, either in near real timeor as a batch transfer of accumulating locations over time. At 1006,central monitoring location receives the location data from themonitoring devices, along with information about individual cellreceivers (e.g., towers, base stations) that relay the location data formonitored population. As noted above information about individual cellreceivers can be added by the monitoring device and/or the cell receiveritself.

At 1008, central monitoring location uses the locations of themonitoring devices 12 and their information of the corresponding cellreceivers that relayed data from the monitoring devices to determinegeographic characteristics about those cell receivers. As noted above,non-limiting examples of those geographic characteristics include a mapof the cellular receiver coverage areas, or an artificial positionmarker and corresponding range. At 1010, that information is stored as atable, database or the like.

Referring to FIG. 11, various steps in an embodiment of the methodologyare shown for examining the location data from an individual monitoringdevice for irregularity. The steps of FIG. 11 are preferably performedafter the steps of FIG. 10 are complete, but the invention is not solimited and there may be a degree of concurrency there between.

At 1102, a particular monitoring device transmits at least location datarepresenting its location, either in near real time or as a batchtransfer of accumulating locations over time. This may occur after theevents of FIG. 11, or may be a part of 1004 as shown by the dashed line.

At 1104, central monitoring location receives the location data from theparticular monitoring device, along with information about theparticular individual cell receiver that the particular monitoringdevice used to send the location data. This may occur after the eventsof FIG. 10, or may be a part of 1006 as shown by the dashed line. Asnoted above, information about the cell receiver can be added by themonitoring device, the cell receiver itself, and/or other intermediateequipment in the cell network.

At 1106, central monitoring location 35 identifies the expected cellreceiver from the received location data of the monitoring device. At1108, central monitoring location determines if the particular cellreceiver with which the device was in communication with at the time theGPS location data was captured is the expected cell receiver. This mayinclude one or more of the tracking or cellular tests described herein.

At 1110, the system responds based on the result of 1108. If theparticular cell receiver is the expected cell receiver, then there is nofollow up action based on that comparison (although other events asknown in the art may be present that require action). If the particularcell receiver is not the expected cell receiver, then the system canreact with notifications, alerts, flags or the like. The system can alsoreact (or elect not to) based on additional consideration of othergeographic factors or non-geographic factors as discussed herein.

It is to be understood that the steps of FIGS. 10 and 11 may be in wholeor in part performed individually, sequentially and/or concurrently. Forexample, the determining of 1008 could be deferred until enough locationdata is received to provide meaningful results. In the alternative, thedetermination of 1008 could be performed concurrently with the receiptof data at 1006 such that results are built up over time. It iscontemplated that the steps could be run a first time, and thenperiodically updated by relying upon a complete set of new data, or acombination of older and newer data.

FIG. 12 illustrates a logical arrangement of a set of general componentsof an example computing device 1200 as could be used for the computerelements of monitoring device 12 and/or central monitoring location 35.In this example, the device includes a processor 1202 for executinginstructions that can be stored in a memory device or element 1204. Aswould be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art, the device caninclude many types of memory, data storage, or non-transitorycomputer-readable storage media, such as a first data storage forprogram instructions for execution by the processor 1202, a separatestorage for images or data, a removable memory for sharing informationwith other devices, etc. The device typically will include some type ofdisplay element 1206, such as a touch screen or liquid crystal display(LCD), although devices such as portable media players might conveyinformation via other means, such as through audio speakers. Asdiscussed, the device in many embodiments will include at least oneinput element 1208 able to receive conventional input from a user. Thisconventional input can include, for example, a push button, touch pad,touch screen, keyboard, mouse, keypad, or any other such device orelement whereby a user can input a command to the device. In someembodiments, the computing device 1200 of FIG. 12 can include one ormore network interface elements 1208 for communicating over variousnetworks, such as a Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, RF, wired, or wirelesscommunication systems. The device in many embodiments can communicatewith a network, such as the Internet, and may be able to communicatewith other such devices.

Each computing device typically will include an operating system thatprovides executable program instructions for the general administrationand operation of that device and typically will includecomputer-readable medium storing instructions that, when executed by aprocessor of the server, allow the computing device to perform itsintended functions. Suitable implementations for the operating systemand general functionality of the servers are known or commerciallyavailable and are readily implemented by persons having ordinary skillin the art, particularly in light of the disclosure herein.

Various embodiments discussed or suggested herein can be implemented ina wide variety of operating environments, which in some cases caninclude one or more user computers, computing devices, or processingdevices which can be used to operate any of a number of applications.User or client devices can include any of a number of general purposepersonal computers, such as desktop or laptop computers running astandard operating system, as well as cellular, wireless, and handhelddevices running mobile software and capable of supporting a number ofnetworking and messaging protocols. Such a system also can include anumber of workstations running any of a variety ofcommercially-available operating systems and other known applicationsfor purposes such as development and database management. These devicesalso can include other electronic devices, such as dummy terminals,thin-clients, gaming systems, and other devices capable of communicatingvia a network.

Most embodiments utilize at least one network that would be familiar tothose skilled in the art for supporting communications using any of avariety of commercially-available protocols, such as TCP/IP, OSI, FTP,UPnP, NFS, CIFS, and AppleTalk. The network can be, for example, a localarea network, a wide-area network, a virtual private network, theInternet, an intranet, an extranet, a public switched telephone network,an infrared network, a wireless network, and any combination thereof.

In embodiments where the computing device includes a Web server, the Webserver can run any of a variety of server or mid-tier applications,including HTTP servers, FTP servers, CGI servers, data servers, Javaservers, and business application servers. The server(s) also may becapable of executing programs or scripts in response requests from userdevices, such as by executing one or more Web applications that may beimplemented as one or more scripts or programs written in anyprogramming language, such as Java®, C, C# or C++, or any scriptinglanguage, such as Perl, Python, or TCL, as well as combinations thereof.The server(s) may also include database servers, including withoutlimitation those commercially available from Oracle®, Microsoft®,Sybase®, and IBM®.

The environment can include a variety of data stores and other memoryand storage media as discussed above. These can reside in a variety oflocations, such as on a storage medium local to (and/or resident in) oneor more of the computers or remote from any or all of the computersacross the network. In a particular set of embodiments, the informationmay reside in a storage-area network (“SAN”) familiar to those skilledin the art. Similarly, any necessary files for performing the functionsattributed to the computers, servers, or other network devices may bestored locally and/or remotely, as appropriate. Where a system includescomputerized devices, each such device can include hardware elementsthat may be electrically coupled via a bus, the elements including, forexample, at least one central processing unit (CPU), at least one inputdevice (e.g., a mouse, keyboard, controller, touch screen, or keypad),and at least one output device (e.g., a display device, printer, orspeaker). Such a system may also include one or more storage devices,such as disk drives, optical storage devices, and solid-state storagedevices such as random access memory (“RAM”) or read-only memory(“ROM”), as well as removable media devices, memory cards, flash cards,etc.

Such devices also can include a computer-readable storage media reader,a communications device (e.g., a modem, a network card (wireless orwired), an infrared communication device, etc.), and working memory asdescribed above. The computer-readable storage media reader can beconnected with, or configured to receive, a computer-readable storagemedium, representing remote, local, fixed, and/or removable storagedevices as well as storage media for temporarily and/or more permanentlycontaining, storing, transmitting, and retrieving computer-readableinformation. The system and various devices also typically will includea number of software applications, modules, services, or other elementslocated within at least one working memory device, including anoperating system and application programs, such as a client applicationor Web browser. It should be appreciated that alternate embodiments mayhave numerous variations from that described above. For example,customized hardware might also be used and/or particular elements mightbe implemented in hardware, software (including portable software, suchas applets), or both. Further, connection to other computing devicessuch as network input/output devices may be employed.

Storage media and computer readable media for containing code, orportions of code, can include any appropriate media known or used in theart, including storage media and communication media, such as but notlimited to volatile and non-volatile, removable and non-removable mediaimplemented in any method or technology for storage and/or transmissionof information such as computer readable instructions, data structures,program modules, or other data, including RAM, ROM, EEPROM, flash memoryor other memory technology, CD-ROM, digital versatile disk (DVD) orother optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape, magnetic diskstorage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other medium which canbe used to store the desired information and which can be accessed by asystem device. Based on the disclosure and teachings provided herein, aperson of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate other ways and/ormethods to implement the various embodiments.

The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in anillustrative rather than a restrictive sense. It will, however, beevident that various modifications and changes may be made thereuntowithout departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention asset forth in the claims.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for detecting potential tampering with adata stream from a monitoring device, comprising: deploying a pluralityof monitoring devices to a monitored population, each of the monitoringdevices configured to transmit at least location data representing itsapproximate location; receiving the location data for a particularmonitoring device and information about a particular cell receiver thatrelayed the location data from the particular monitoring device;identifying, based on an approximate location of the particularmonitoring device from the location data received during the receiving,an expected cell receiver for the approximate location; comparing theparticular cell receiver with the expected cell receiver; wherein theparticular cell receiver is considered to be unexpected in response toat least a negative result of the comparing.
 2. The method of claim 1,further comprising determining, based at least on received content ofthe receiving, if the particular cell receiver is an unexpected cellreceiver or an expected cell receiver for the particular monitoringdevice.
 3. The method of claim 2, wherein the determining comprisesdetermining, based on a location of the particular monitoring device,whether the particular monitoring device communicated with the expectedcell receiver.
 4. The method of claim 2, wherein the determiningcomprises: identifying, based on a location of the particular monitoringdevice, the expected cell receiver for that location.
 5. The method ofclaim 1, further comprising determining, from received content of thereceiving, at least one expected geographic characteristic of theparticular cell receiver.
 6. The method of claim 5, wherein thedetermining comprises establishing an artificial geographic marker forthe particular cell receiver, the marker representing an approximateaverage position of movement of the monitored population within theparticular cell receiver.
 7. The method of claim 6, wherein thedetermining comprises: identifying, from a location of the particularmonitoring device and proximity of at least one of the artificialgeographic markers, the expected cell receiver; comparing the particularcell receiver with the expected cell receiver.
 8. The method of claim 1,further comprising issuing an alert to authorities when the particularcell receiver is not the expected cell receiver.
 9. The method of claim1, further comprising: determining at least one of the following:whether the particular cell receiver is a base station from anauthorized source; whether a number of monitored devices using theparticular cell receiver is above a predetermined number; issuing analert to authorities when the particular cell receiver is not theexpected cell receiver and a negative or mixed result of thedetermining.
 10. The method of claim 1, further comprising: determiningat least one of the following: whether the particular cell receiver is abase station from an authorized source; whether a number of monitoreddevices using the particular cell receiver is above a predeterminednumber; issuing an alert to authorities when the particular cellreceiver is not the expected cell receiver and a negative or mixedresult of the determining.
 11. A system for detecting potentialtampering with a data stream from a monitoring device, comprising: aplurality of monitoring devices deployed to a monitored population, eachof the monitoring devices configured to transmit at least location datarepresenting its approximate location; a central location having amemory storing instructions and a process for executing the instructionsto perform operations comprising: receiving the location data for aparticular monitoring device and information about a particular cellreceiver that relayed the location data from the particular monitoringdevice; identifying, based on an approximate location of the particularmonitoring device from the location data received during the receiving,an expected cell receiver for the approximate location; comparing theparticular cell receiver with the expected cell receiver; wherein theparticular cell receiver is considered to be unexpected in response toat least a negative result of the comparing.
 12. The system of claim 11,further comprising determining, based at least on received content ofthe receiving, if the particular cell receiver is an unexpected cellreceiver or an expected cell receiver for the particular monitoringdevice.
 13. The system of claim 12, wherein the determining comprisesdetermining, based on a location of the particular monitoring device,whether the particular monitoring device communicated with the expectedcell receiver.
 14. The system of claim 12, wherein the determiningcomprises: identifying, based on a location of the particular monitoringdevice, the expected cell receiver for that location; comparing theparticular cell receiver with the expected cell receiver.
 15. The systemof claim 11, further comprising determining, from received content ofthe receiving, at least one expected geographic characteristic of theparticular cell receiver.
 16. The system of claim 15, wherein thedetermining comprises establishing an artificial geographic marker forthe particular cell receiver, the marker representing an approximateaverage position of movement of the monitored population within theparticular cell receiver.
 17. The system of claim 16, wherein thedetermining comprises: identifying, from a location of the particularmonitoring device and proximity of at least one of the artificialgeographic markers, the expected cell receiver; comparing the particularcell receiver with the expected cell receiver.
 18. The system of claim11, further comprising issuing an alert to authorities when theparticular cell receiver is not the expected cell receiver.
 19. Thesystem of claim 11, further comprising: determining at least one of thefollowing: whether the particular cell receiver is a base station froman authorized source; whether a number of monitored devices using theparticular cell receiver is above a predetermined number; issuing analert to authorities when the particular cell receiver is not theexpected cell receiver and a negative or mixed result of thedetermining.
 20. The system of claim 11, further comprising: determiningat least one of the following: whether the particular cell receiver is abase station from an authorized source; whether a number of monitoreddevices using the particular cell receiver is above a predeterminednumber; issuing an alert to authorities when the particular cellreceiver is not the expected cell receiver and a negative or mixedresult of the determining.